Supprimer un achat/sous-traitance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'Action irréversible' and notes that confirmation may be requested, which are behavioral traits beyond the annotations (destructiveHint=true). It clarifies the irreversibility and potential confirmation step.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using only two sentences and a warning symbol. Every sentence is essential and adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete-by-id tool with good annotations and an output schema, the description is complete enough. It covers the action, irreversibility, and confirmation behavior. Could mention result or error handling, but not necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not add any information about the 'id' parameter beyond what the input schema already provides (100% coverage). The schema already describes the parameter adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Supprime' and the resource 'achat de BoondManager', distinguishing it from other delete tools for different entities. The title reinforces the resource ('achat/sous-traitance').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions when confirmation is needed (if client supports elicitation), but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus other delete tools or alternatives. Usage context is only implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.