Skip to main content
Glama
fauguste

boondmanager-mcp-server

Rechercher des drapeaux

boond_flags_search
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search BoondManager flags by keywords with pagination to locate a flag's ID or list existing flags. Returns one-line summaries.

Instructions

Liste et recherche les drapeaux de BoondManager, par mots-clés et pagination.

Quand : pour retrouver l'ID d'un(e) drapeau à partir de son nom, ou pour énumérer les drapeaux existant(e)s. Plutôt que : boond_flags_get si l'ID est déjà connu — la recherche ne renvoie qu'un résumé d'une ligne par drapeau.

Returns : page de résumés (ID + libellé principal), plus structuredContent.total = nombre total côté BoondManager. Lecture seule.

  • fields : projection côté MCP, jamais transmise à l'API — remplace le résumé par les seuls attributs listés (noms inconnus ignorés). À utiliser sur les grosses pages.

  • Pagination : pageSize 1–500 (défaut 30), page 1–100 — au-delà : refus, affiner les filtres.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoNuméro de page (défaut: 1, max: 100)
fieldsNoProjection : attributs à afficher par résultat (ex: ['title','updateDate']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés.
keywordsNoMots-clés de recherche (nom, email, compétences...)
pageSizeNoNombre de résultats par page (max: 500, défaut: 30)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countYesNombre d'éléments retournés sur cette page
itemsYes
totalNoNombre total de résultats côté BoondManager

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.12.2
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv2.9.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / fields
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Projection : attributs à afficher par résultat (ex: ['title','updateDate']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv2.7.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "count": {
      +      "description": "Nombre d'éléments retournés sur cette page",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "items": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": false,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "attributes": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {},
      +            "description": "Attributs projetés (présent si `fields` est fourni)",
      +            "propertyNames": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "id": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "summary": {
      +            "description": "Résumé standard (absent si `fields` est fourni)",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "type": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "total": {
      +      "description": "Nombre total de résultats côté BoondManager",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "count",
      +    "items"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observedv2.1.0

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond the annotations by disclosing that the result is a page of summaries (ID + main label), that `total` comes from BoondManager, and that `fields` is a local MCP-side projection never sent to the API. It also documents boundary behavior: pages beyond the limits are refused and filters should be refined. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well structured with labeled sections ('Quand', 'Plutôt que', 'Returns') and short bullet explanations for parameters. Every sentence contributes either usage context, return behavior, or parameter nuance. It is detailed but not bloated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations, output schema, and full schema coverage, the description covers all necessary aspects: when to use it, when not to, what it returns, how parameters behave, and pagination constraints. An agent has enough information to select and call this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema already covers all parameters, the description adds crucial semantics: `fields` is a client-side projection that replaces the summary and ignores unknown names, and pagination limits are tied to a refusal behavior with a suggested mitigation. This is meaningful value beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states a specific action ('Liste et recherche les drapeaux') on a specific resource (BoondManager flags) with distinct mechanisms (keywords and pagination). It also differentiates itself from the sibling `boond_flags_get` by emphasizing that search returns only a one-line summary, making the tool's purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'pour retrouver l'ID d'un(e) drapeau à partir de son nom, ou pour énumérer les drapeaux existant(e)s'. It also states the alternative: use `boond_flags_get` when the ID is already known, giving the agent a clear decision rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools