Skip to main content
Glama
fauguste

boondmanager-mcp-server

Modifier un(e) facture

boond_invoices_update
Idempotent

Update an existing invoice by ID, modifying only the fields you provide. Ideal for changing specific details like state, date, or payment info without recreating the record.

Instructions

Met à jour un(e) facture existant(e), identifié(e) par son ID.

Quand : pour modifier quelques champs d'un enregistrement déjà en base. Plutôt que : boond_invoices_create si l'enregistrement n'existe pas encore.

  • Mise à jour partielle : seuls les champs fournis sont écrits, les autres sont laissés en place.

  • Attention aux champs de type tableau, qui sont remplacés et non fusionnés.

Returns : confirmation et fiche mise à jour.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID de la facture à modifier
noteNoNotes
stateNoÉtat de la facture
taxRateNoTaux de TVA (%)
referenceNoRéférence de la facture
invoiceDateNoDate de facturation (YYYY-MM-DD)
invoiceRecordsNoLignes de facture Boond
invoicePaymentsNoPaiements client de la facture
amountExcludingTaxNoMontant HT
expectedPaymentDateNoDate d'échéance/paiement attendu (YYYY-MM-DD)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoIdentifiant de l'entité créée/modifiée
typeNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.12.2
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv2.8.0
    • removedInput schema / properties / dueDate
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Date d'échéance (YYYY-MM-DD)",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedInput schema / properties / expectedPaymentDate
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Date d'échéance/paiement attendu (YYYY-MM-DD)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / invoicePayments
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Paiements client de la facture",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "propertyNames": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / invoiceRecords
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Lignes de facture Boond",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "propertyNames": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv2.7.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "id": {
      +      "description": "Identifiant de l'entité créée/modifiée",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observedv2.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, destructive, and idempotent hints. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond those: partial update semantics, the warning that array fields are replaced rather than merged, and the return payload. This is strong supplementary disclosure for an update operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action, followed by a compact 'Quand / Plutôt que' usage block and two focused bullet points. Every sentence earns its place; there is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description does not need to document return structure in depth. It covers purpose, usage boundaries, partial-update behavior, array-replacement risks, and the return confirmation, making it complete enough for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description goes further by clarifying that only provided fields are written and that array parameters like invoiceRecords and invoicePayments are replaced, not merged. This adds meaningful semantics that the schema alone does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Met à jour un(e) facture existant(e), identifié(e) par son ID.' This clearly distinguishes the tool as an update operation for existing invoices, and the explicit contrast with boond_invoices_create helps an agent identify it among the many CRUD siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states both when to use this tool ('pour modifier quelques champs d'un enregistrement déjà en base') and when not to, explicitly routing the agent to boond_invoices_create if the record does not yet exist. This is direct, unambiguous usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools