zda_list_groups
List all Zendesk groups to view and manage group configurations.
Instructions
List all Zendesk groups.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all Zendesk groups to view and manage group configurations.
List all Zendesk groups.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'List all Zendesk groups' but does not mention pagination, authentication requirements, or return format. For a simple list tool, this is minimally adequate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the zero parameters and lack of output schema, the description is minimally complete for a list tool. However, it lacks context on what the list contains (e.g., group names, IDs) or any limitations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists all Zendesk groups, distinguishing it from sibling tools that list other resources like automations or macros.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as zda_get_group for individual groups or zda_create_group for creating groups.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sniebauer/zendesk-admin-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server