object.set_display

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal, and the description adds no behavioral context. It does not indicate whether the tool modifies the scene, what side effects occur, or any prerequisites. The risk and maturity labels are not behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It front-loads the tool name, which is redundant, and provides no substantive information. It could be longer and more informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 8 parameters, an output schema, and many siblings, the description is grossly incomplete. An agent cannot know what the tool does, when to use it, or how to correctly set parameters. Even the output schema doesn't compensate for the missing purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low at 38%, and the description does not explain any parameter. The displayType enum exists but its meaning is not described. The description adds zero value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only restates the tool name and provides metadata about risk and maturity. It does not state what the tool does, such as setting the display mode of a Blender object. This is a tautology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like blender_object_set_visibility or blender_object_transform. The only mention is generic session policy, which doesn't help differentiate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.