set_smooth_shading

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It accurately describes the action and return type, but could mention that it affects all faces and modifies normals. However, for a simple boolean operation, the current description is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with purpose, a TIP, and an Args section. It is not overly long, but the TIP adds bulk. Some sentences could be combined, but overall it is clear and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only two simple parameters and an output schema present, the description fully explains the parameters and return value. The TIP provides additional useful context about alternatives, making it complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description compensates by adding an 'Args' section that explains both parameters with clear semantics, beyond the schema's titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets smooth or flat shading on an object, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'shade_auto_smooth' by providing a TIP, thus making its unique purpose evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The TIP explicitly recommends using 'shade_auto_smooth' for production use with a clear rationale, providing explicit when-not-to-use guidance and an alternative tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.