set_transcode_on_ingest

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a write operation (enable/disable), which is consistent with annotations (readOnlyHint=false). However, no additional behavioral details are provided beyond what annotations already convey. For a simple toggle, this is adequate but could be improved by noting effects on current ingest or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded. It contains no unnecessary words, but could be slightly expanded without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (1 boolean parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally complete. It could mention that this is a project-wide setting affecting future ingest only, or differentiate from similar tools, but for a simple boolean the current version is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description is clear. The main description does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (enable/disable), resource (transcoding on ingest), and scope (for the project). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools, as no other sibling focuses exactly on transcoding on ingest.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or context provided. The description solely states the action without any 'when to use' or 'when not to use' information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.