Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Get Encoder Presets

get_encoder_presets
Read-onlyIdempotent

List Adobe Media Encoder export presets and their .epr paths so you can pass them to export_sequence or encode_project_item. Filter by format or preset name.

Instructions

List available Adobe Media Encoder export presets, with the .epr path of each so it can be passed to export_sequence or encode_project_item. Presets are discovered by scanning the .epr files Adobe ships on disk (Premiere's ExtendScript API exposes no preset enumeration).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatNoFilter by container/format (e.g. 'H.264', 'mp4', 'QuickTime', 'WAV') or preset name (e.g. 'ProRes', 'Proxy'). Presets whose format matches come first. Omit to list all.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.18.6
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / format / description
      Previous value: -"Filter to presets whose name or format bucket matches this (e.g. 'H.264', 'ProRes', 'Proxy'). Omit to list all."New value: +"Filter by container/format (e.g. 'H.264', 'mp4', 'QuickTime', 'WAV') or preset name (e.g. 'ProRes', 'Proxy'). Presets whose format matches come first. Omit to list all."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv1.1.5
    • changedInput schema / properties / format / description
      Previous value: -"Format name to list presets for (e.g., 'H.264', 'QuickTime', 'MPEG2'). Leave empty to list formats."New value: +"Filter to presets whose name or format bucket matches this (e.g. 'H.264', 'ProRes', 'Proxy'). Omit to list all."
  5. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuine behavioral context beyond the schema: presets are discovered by scanning .epr files on disk because Premiere's ExtendScript API exposes no enumeration, which explains result provenance and completeness limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste, front-loaded with the action and return value before the implementation note. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-format explanation is unnecessary, and annotations cover the safety profile. For a simple one-optional-param discovery tool, the description supplies everything an agent needs to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the single 'format' parameter and its match-ordering behavior are already fully documented in the schema. The description adds no extra parameter detail, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('Adobe Media Encoder export presets'), and adds the concrete return content (the .epr path) plus its downstream consumers. This distinguishes it from siblings like export_sequence, encode_project_item, and validate_export_preset.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the purpose in a workflow sense by naming export_sequence and encode_project_item as the tools the .epr paths feed into. It implies this is a discovery step but does not explicitly state when not to use it or name a competing discovery tool, so it falls short of the top tier.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools