set_sequence_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Modify' without disclosing mutation behavior, error cases, or side effects. It does not mention validation or default behavior for omitted parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, efficient but too minimal. It lacks structure and detail that could improve usability, though it has no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, valid ranges, or behavior when sequence_id is omitted (schema says use active, but description doesn't).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description mentions 'frame rate' which is not in the schema, causing mismatch. The description adds no meaningful detail beyond the schema, and the extra mention could mislead.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Modify' and the resource 'sequence settings', with examples like frame size and frame rate. It distinguishes from sibling tools that set individual parameters (e.g., set_sequence_frame_rate, set_sequence_resolution).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for modifying multiple settings at once, but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives are provided. There is no guidance on when to prefer this over individual setter tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.