set_clip_volume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is not read-only, not idempotent, and not destructive, so the description only needs to add extra behavioral nuance. It usefully discloses that Essential Sound Amplify automation is untouched, but it does not mention return behavior, effect on existing Volume automation, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences and wastes no words. The main purpose is front-loaded, and the second sentence adds a relevant behavioral caveat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter setter with no output schema, the description covers purpose, target parameter, units, and a behavioral boundary. It lacks return/error expectations and alternative-tool guidance, but overall it is reasonably complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are already described meaningfully, including volume_db's 0=unity convention. The description does not add further parameter-level detail, so the schema carries the semantic load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb-object pair – setting an audio clip's Volume > Level in dB – and adds a clear scoping exclusion about Essential Sound Amplify automation. The singular 'an audio clip' helps distinguish this from the sibling tool set_clips_volume.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to choose this tool over related siblings like set_clips_volume, adjust_audio_levels, or set_clip_properties. It only says what the tool does not affect, not which tool should be used for what scenario.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.