Publish Mogrt To Library

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds valuable behavioral detail beyond them: it requires explicit confirmation and will fail rather than replace an existing version. This clarifies the non-destructive but irreversible publish behavior, though it does not cover permissions or response details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action and immediately followed by the most important behavioral constraints. Every clause earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation with full schema coverage, an output schema, and clear annotations, the description provides everything an agent needs: the source token requirement, explicit confirmation requirement, immutability, and failure mode. No critical invocation or safety context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented in the schema. The description reinforces that the preview_token corresponds to the exact previewed MOGRT and that confirmation is mandatory, but it does not add syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (publish) and resource (exact previewed MOGRT as an immutable local-library version), making the operation and scope immediately clear. It distinguishes this from sibling tools like preview_mogrt_library_publish and import_mogrt_from_library by emphasizing the immutable local-library publish action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear prerequisites: the MOGRT must be exactly previewed, and explicit confirmation is required. It also states an important usage boundary — the tool will fail instead of replacing an existing version — though it does not explicitly name alternative tools for that case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.