Publish Mogrt To Library

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds significant behavioral context beyond the annotations: the result is immutable, confirmation is mandatory, and the operation fails instead of replacing an existing version. These details meaningfully inform an agent about side effects and safety, and they do not contradict the provided annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, followed by the critical confirmation requirement and failure behavior, making every sentence informative and necessary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description, combined with a fully descriptive schema and an output schema, is complete for this tool. It communicates the essential preconditions, safety behavior, and immutable nature of the result without omitting anything an agent needs to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full coverage with clear descriptions for both preview_token and confirm_publish. The tool description adds thematic emphasis on 'exact previewed' and 'explicit confirmation,' but does not materially enrich the parameter semantics beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Publish the exact previewed MOGRT as an immutable local-library version.' This clearly distinguishes it from related preview and import MOGRT tools by emphasizing immutability and the exact-preview relationship.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear operational context: the tool requires explicit confirmation and will fail rather than overwrite an existing version. It implies the correct workflow of using a preview token first, though it does not explicitly name sibling alternatives or state when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.