Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Import Fcp Xml

import_fcp_xml

Open a Final Cut Pro XML file as a new Premiere project by specifying the source XML and destination .prproj path; it imports the timeline without merging into the open project.

Instructions

Open a Final Cut Pro XML file as a new Premiere project. app.openFCPXML(path, projPath) requires a destination project path; it does not merge the XML into the currently open project. verified is true only when that destination exists as a file and Premiere has that exact path open.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesFull path to the FCP XML file to read
project_pathYesFull path of the new .prproj file Premiere should create for the imported timeline. Required: app.openFCPXML takes both a source and a destination path.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.18.6
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.14.9
    • changedInput schema / properties / path / description
      Previous value: -"Full path to the FCP XML file"New value: +"Full path to the FCP XML file to read"
    • addedInput schema / properties / project_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Full path of the new .prproj file Premiere should create for the imported timeline. Required: app.openFCPXML takes both a source and a destination path.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "path"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "path",
      +  "project_path"
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  5. Addedv1.1.5
  6. Removedv1.1.5
  7. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations already covering safety hints, the description adds meaningful behavior: a destination project path is required, the XML is not merged, and the verified flag depends on the destination file existing and being open in Premiere. This goes beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by the key constraint and verification semantics. No wasted language.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be fully explained, and the description still clarifies the verified flag. It covers the main operational constraints, though it could say more about failure modes or supported FCPXML expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description reinforces that both source and destination paths are required by referencing app.openFCPXML(path, projPath), but it does not add new format or syntax details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: opening a Final Cut Pro XML file as a new Premiere project. It also distinguishes the operation from merging into the current project, which helps separate it from sibling import tools like import_edl or import_sequences.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly states the usage context and a when-not condition: the XML is opened as a new project and does not merge into the currently open project. It does not name explicit alternatives, but the destination-path requirement gives strong operational guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools