Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Preview Product Spot

preview_product_spot
Read-onlyIdempotent

Preview a product-spot timeline assembly from existing project items before applying it to an empty sequence, with item-ID checks and host readback reporting.

Instructions

Preview a product-spot assembly from existing project items. The eventual apply is limited to explicit empty tracks, revalidates item IDs, and reports host readback without claiming visual delivery verification.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sequence_idYesExact ID of an existing empty destination sequence. It must be active at apply time.
motion_styleNoScale-motion style for product and brand spots; defaults to alternate.
asset_item_idsYesExact existing project-item node IDs in playback order; external media paths are deliberately not imported by this workflow.
transition_nameNoTransition name; defaults to Cross Dissolve. Use none to disable transitions.
audio_track_indexNoEmpty destination audio track index, default 0.
video_track_indexNoEmpty destination video track index, default 0.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
clip_duration_secondsNoPlanned spacing between asset starts; defaults to 5 seconds for a motion demo and 4 seconds for spots.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.
transition_duration_secondsNoTransition duration, default 0.75 seconds for demos and 0.5 seconds for spots.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.25.0
    • addedOutput schema / properties / idempotency
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Present when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.24.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_cep_target
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "sequence_id"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "source_item"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Optional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "backend": {
      +      "const": "cep",
      +      "description": "Backend namespace for these IDs.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clip": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Optional exact reviewed timeline clip.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "effect": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "Reviewed effect and parameter identity checked before mutation.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "display_name": {
      +              "description": "Optional exact host display name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "match_name": {
      +              "description": "Effect match name from host inspection.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_index": {
      +              "description": "Inspected zero-based parameter index.",
      +              "maximum": 255,
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_name": {
      +              "description": "Exact inspected parameter name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "match_name",
      +            "parameter_index",
      +            "parameter_name"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "end_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive timeline end ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "in_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected source In ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Stable CEP node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "out_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive source Out ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "project_item_id": {
      +          "description": "Expected source project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "start_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected timeline start ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "track_index": {
      +          "description": "Expected zero-based track index; identity still checked.",
      +          "maximum": 255,
      +          "minimum": 0,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "track_type": {
      +          "description": "Expected media track group.",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "video",
      +            "audio"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id",
      +        "track_type",
      +        "track_index"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "project_document_id": {
      +      "description": "Exact Premiere project document ID observed during review.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sequence_id": {
      +      "description": "Stable expected active sequence ID.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source_item": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Reviewed source identity for a source-only operation.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "media_path": {
      +          "description": "Optional exact source-media path.",
      +          "maxLength": 4096,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Exact project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "backend"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_project_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.",
      +  "maxLength": 4096,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Versioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.18.6
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv1.14.9
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  5. Addedv1.14.4

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/idempotentHint true and destructiveHint false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value by scoping the eventual apply to explicit empty tracks, promising item-ID revalidation, and explicitly disclaiming visual delivery verification from host readback. However, the second sentence drifts into describing the apply tool rather than this preview, so the added transparency is only partly about this call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, purpose front-loaded, no filler. The second sentence is dense but earns most of its words; the only waste is that it describes the apply counterpart's guarantees rather than this tool's own behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and a fully documented ten-parameter nested schema, the description does not need to explain return values or parameters. It correctly frames the preview/apply relationship and the readback-vs-visual-verification caveat; the main omission is the empty-sequence precondition, which only the schema states.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and every one of the ten parameters is documented in the schema, including defaults and the nested expected_cep_target guard. The description mentions no parameter at all, so it neither adds nor subtracts; baseline 3 applies when the schema carries the load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

A specific verb ('Preview') plus a specific resource ('a product-spot assembly from existing project items') tells an agent exactly what it produces, and 'from existing project items' scopes the input. It does not name the sibling it complements (preview_brand_spot or apply_spot_workflow_plan), so the differentiation is only partial.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The sentence about 'the eventual apply' implies this is a preview-before-apply step, so the workflow context is inferable. But no sibling is named, there is no explicit 'use this instead of X' routing, and the precondition that the destination sequence must already be empty appears only in the schema, not the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools