Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Slide Edit

slide_edit

Slide a clip left or right by offset seconds, checking all clips first and syncing linked audio/video by default. Requires valid media durations and rejects stills or reversed speeds.

Instructions

Perform a verified slide edit on a clip using adjacent clips from the public timeline DOM. Linked audio/video partners get the same edit by default (include_linked); every clip is checked before any is changed. Requires readable finite media and ffprobe duration evidence for every edited source; refuses unknown duration, stills, and nonunit/reversed speed before mutation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
node_idYesNode ID of the clip
include_linkedNoAlso apply the edit to the clip's linked audio/video partners so picture and sound stay in sync (default: true).
offset_secondsYesOffset in seconds (positive = slide right, negative = slide left)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.18.6
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / include_linked
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Also apply the edit to the clip's linked audio/video partners so picture and sound stay in sync (default: true).",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  4. Addedv1.1.5
  5. Removedv1.1.5
  6. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well past the annotations (readOnly=false, destructive=false, idempotent=false) by disclosing real execution semantics: linked audio/video partners are edited by default via include_linked, all clips are validated before any mutation (atomic preflight), and the tool refuses at validation time rather than partially applying. That is exactly the behavioral detail an agent needs before invoking a timeline mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with the primary action front-loaded and supporting constraints following. No filler, though terms like 'public timeline DOM' and 'nonunit speed' are implementation jargon that costs a little readability for little gain.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a verified mutation tool with a full input schema, output schema, and annotations, the description covers prerequisites, default side effects, and refusal conditions. Error/return behavior is left to the output schema, which is fine, but the lack of a stated failure contract after validation leaves a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and all three parameters carry descriptions, including the include_linked default and the sign convention for offset_seconds. The prose only restates what the schema already says, so this is the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('perform a verified slide edit on a clip') and describes the mechanism (adjacent clips from the timeline DOM). It never explicitly contrasts itself with the nearby sibling edit operations slip_edit and roll_edit, so an agent must already know NLE terminology to route correctly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete preconditions for use: readable finite media, ffprobe duration evidence, and an explicit refusal list (unknown duration, stills, nonunit/reversed speed). It stops short of naming the alternative to call when those conditions fail, so the when-not path is implied rather than routed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools