get_color_space
Retrieve the color space details for a project item using its ID or name.
Instructions
Get the color space information for a project item
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | Node ID or name of the project item |
Retrieve the color space details for a project item using its ID or name.
Get the color space information for a project item
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | Node ID or name of the project item |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds no behavioral context about return format, potential errors, or limits. It is consistent but does not enhance transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence of 10 words is concise and direct, but it could include a brief note on output without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description should indicate what kind of color space info is returned. It is minimal for a tool with no further structured documentation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter described as 'Node ID or name of the project item'. The description adds no additional nuance beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get the color space information for a project item', with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools that focus on other properties.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_item_info' or 'color_correct'. No exclusionary or contextual hints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/leancoderkavy/premiere-pro-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server