Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Add To Render Queue

add_to_render_queue

Add the active sequence to Adobe Media Encoder's render queue using an output path and optional preset, then verify the queued job independently.

Instructions

Request an Adobe Media Encoder render-queue handoff for the active sequence. Verify queue presence or the output file independently.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
output_pathYesFull output file path
preset_pathNoPath to an AME preset file (.epr)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The second sentence 'Verify queue presence or the output file independently' discloses that the tool only requests a handoff and does not guarantee the queue item or output file, which is valuable beyond the all-false annotations. It communicates asynchronous/non-deterministic behavior without contradicting the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, action first, with the caveat placed second; no filler or repetition of schema/annotation content. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter tool with an output schema and clear scope, the description is mostly complete and includes a crucial independent-verification caveat. It stops short of full completeness because it does not differentiate from AME-related siblings like start_batch_encode or get_render_queue_status.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents output_path and preset_path clearly. The description adds no parameter-level detail, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('request'), resource ('Adobe Media Encoder render-queue handoff'), and scope ('active sequence'), which distinguishes it from export_sequence, encode_file, and get_render_queue_status. It is not a tautology and tells an agent what the tool accomplishes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The active-sequence scope implies the tool is for handing off the current sequence, but there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternatives are named among AME-related siblings. The verification note is behavioral advice, not usage routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools