Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Create Context Edit Plan

create_context_edit_plan
Read-onlyIdempotent

Creates a non-mutating, evidence-backed edit-plan scaffold from indexed Premiere context with ranked source/time candidates and stale-state guards, so edits are reviewed before preview or mutation.

Instructions

Create a non-mutating, evidence-backed edit-plan scaffold from indexed Premiere context. It returns ranked source/time candidates and stale-state guards; the model must review them and use preview_edit_plan before any mutation.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
intentYesEditing goal, such as finding the strongest budget explanation for a rough cut
strategyNoPlanning mode; default rough_cut
project_idYesProject context ID returned by manage_project_context capture
sequence_idNoOptional exact sequence ID filter
max_candidatesNoMaximum 25; default 8
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.25.0
    • addedOutput schema / properties / idempotency
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Present when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.24.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_cep_target
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "sequence_id"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "source_item"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Optional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "backend": {
      +      "const": "cep",
      +      "description": "Backend namespace for these IDs.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clip": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Optional exact reviewed timeline clip.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "effect": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "Reviewed effect and parameter identity checked before mutation.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "display_name": {
      +              "description": "Optional exact host display name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "match_name": {
      +              "description": "Effect match name from host inspection.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_index": {
      +              "description": "Inspected zero-based parameter index.",
      +              "maximum": 255,
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_name": {
      +              "description": "Exact inspected parameter name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "match_name",
      +            "parameter_index",
      +            "parameter_name"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "end_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive timeline end ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "in_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected source In ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Stable CEP node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "out_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive source Out ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "project_item_id": {
      +          "description": "Expected source project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "start_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected timeline start ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "track_index": {
      +          "description": "Expected zero-based track index; identity still checked.",
      +          "maximum": 255,
      +          "minimum": 0,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "track_type": {
      +          "description": "Expected media track group.",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "video",
      +            "audio"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id",
      +        "track_type",
      +        "track_index"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "project_document_id": {
      +      "description": "Exact Premiere project document ID observed during review.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sequence_id": {
      +      "description": "Stable expected active sequence ID.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source_item": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Reviewed source identity for a source-only operation.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "media_path": {
      +          "description": "Optional exact source-media path.",
      +          "maxLength": 4096,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Exact project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "backend"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_project_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.",
      +  "maxLength": 4096,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Versioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.18.6
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  4. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. Addedv1.11.3

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish read-only, non-destructive, idempotent behavior, and the description adds useful context by saying it returns ranked source/time candidates and stale-state guards. It also reinforces that review is required before mutation, though it does not elaborate on indexed-context prerequisites or failure modes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loads the core operation, and spends the remainder on the critical workflow guardrail. There is no redundant or filler language.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, the annotations cover safety properties, and the description explains the returned candidate/guard concept plus the required preview step. It is nearly complete, though it could more explicitly surface the required project context or indexed-state prerequisite.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all seven parameters are already documented in the schema. The description does not add parameter-level meaning beyond referring broadly to 'indexed Premiere context,' so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('edit-plan scaffold') and scopes it as non-mutating, evidence-backed, and derived from indexed Premiere context. It also explicitly names preview_edit_plan as the required next step before mutation, which makes the tool's role distinguishable from mutation siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly states the workflow context: the model must review the returned candidates and use preview_edit_plan before any mutation. This gives a strong when-to-use cue and names the safer follow-up tool, though it does not explicitly exclude similar planning tools such as create_editorial_plan.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools