Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Plan Silence Review Markers

plan_silence_review_markers
Read-onlyIdempotent

Maps FFmpeg-detected source-media silences to a known 1x timeline placement, clips candidates to the source span, and redacts paths for review without adding markers or changing Premiere.

Instructions

Create a bounded, non-mutating review plan that maps FFmpeg-detected source-media silences onto one known 1x timeline placement. It clips candidates to the supplied source in/out span, redacts the source path, and never adds markers, cuts clips, or changes Premiere.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
media_pathYesAbsolute path to the local source media file to analyse.
max_candidatesNoMaximum candidate ranges to return (default: 50, maximum: 200).
source_in_secondsNoSource-media in point used by the placement (default: 0).
noise_threshold_dbNoLevel at or below which audio counts as silence, in dBFS (default: -30).
source_out_secondsNoExclusive source-media out point used by the placement. Defaults to the detected media duration when available.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
min_duration_secondsNoShortest run of silence to consider (default: 1.5).
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.
timeline_start_secondsYesTimeline time where this 1x source placement begins.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.25.0
    • addedOutput schema / properties / idempotency
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Present when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.24.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_cep_target
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "sequence_id"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "source_item"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Optional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "backend": {
      +      "const": "cep",
      +      "description": "Backend namespace for these IDs.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clip": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Optional exact reviewed timeline clip.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "effect": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "Reviewed effect and parameter identity checked before mutation.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "display_name": {
      +              "description": "Optional exact host display name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "match_name": {
      +              "description": "Effect match name from host inspection.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_index": {
      +              "description": "Inspected zero-based parameter index.",
      +              "maximum": 255,
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_name": {
      +              "description": "Exact inspected parameter name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "match_name",
      +            "parameter_index",
      +            "parameter_name"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "end_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive timeline end ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "in_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected source In ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Stable CEP node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "out_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive source Out ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "project_item_id": {
      +          "description": "Expected source project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "start_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected timeline start ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "track_index": {
      +          "description": "Expected zero-based track index; identity still checked.",
      +          "maximum": 255,
      +          "minimum": 0,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "track_type": {
      +          "description": "Expected media track group.",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "video",
      +            "audio"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id",
      +        "track_type",
      +        "track_index"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "project_document_id": {
      +      "description": "Exact Premiere project document ID observed during review.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sequence_id": {
      +      "description": "Stable expected active sequence ID.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source_item": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Reviewed source identity for a source-only operation.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "media_path": {
      +          "description": "Optional exact source-media path.",
      +          "maxLength": 4096,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Exact project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "backend"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_project_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.",
      +  "maxLength": 4096,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Versioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.18.6
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv1.14.9
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  5. Addedv1.14.4

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/non-destructive, so the safety bar is pre-cleared; the description still adds real non-obvious behavior: detection is FFmpeg-based, candidates are clipped to the supplied in/out span, the source path is redacted from the plan, and output is bounded. Path redaction in particular is a behavioral trait an agent could not learn from the schema or annotations. Not a 5 because no caveats are given about failure modes (unreadable media, missing FFmpeg, no silences found).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and its scope, second sentence carries the constraints and the explicit non-mutation guarantee. No filler, no restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present the description need not explain the plan's shape, and annotations plus 100% schema coverage carry safety and parameter detail, so what remains is well covered. The one gap is the handoff story: nothing says the resulting plan is meant to be consumed by a follow-up apply tool, which matters given this tool deliberately stops short of writing anything.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every one of the 9 parameters, including the nested expected_cep_target guard, is already documented in structured data; baseline is 3. The description adds only light meaning beyond that — that candidates are clipped by the source in/out span and that output is bounded — without explaining units, defaults, or how expected_cep_target interacts with a read-only planning call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and object ('Create a bounded, non-mutating review plan') and pins the resource precisely: FFmpeg-detected source-media silences mapped onto one 1x timeline placement. It implicitly separates itself from the marker-writing tools by declaring it 'never adds markers, cuts clips, or changes Premiere', but it never names the sibling it defers to (add_markers_batch / detect_silence), so differentiation is inferential rather than explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'non-mutating review plan' plus 'never adds markers, cuts clips, or changes Premiere' tells the agent this is the preview stage, not the apply stage, which is the key routing decision against the many mutation siblings. There is no explicit 'use X instead when...' clause or stated prerequisite (e.g. run detect_silence first, or feed the plan into add_markers_batch), leaving the follow-up path to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools