Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Set Anti Alias Quality

set_anti_alias_quality

Adjust anti-aliasing on a clip's Motion effect to improve edge quality when scaling or rotating. Enable or disable this setting directly via node ID.

Instructions

Set the anti-alias quality on a clip's Motion effect (useful for scaled/rotated clips).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
enabledYesEnable (true) or disable (false) anti-aliasing
node_idYesNode ID of the clip

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive. The description adds context that the change applies to the Motion effect, but it does not disclose side effects, prerequisites, or behavior when the clip lacks a Motion effect. Given the annotations, this is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that wastes no words. It states the action, the target effect, and the intended use case, with no filler or repetition of schema details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only two well-documented parameters, annotations covering mutation/destructiveness, and an output schema present, the description covers the essential context for correct invocation. The use case guidance further reduces ambiguity, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both parameters comprehensively (node_id and enabled) with 100% coverage. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline but does not improve on it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Set'), a precise target ('anti-alias quality on a clip's Motion effect'), and a practical use case ('scaled/rotated clips'). This clearly differentiates it from other effect-modification tools like set_frame_blend or set_blend_mode.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The parenthetical '(useful for scaled/rotated clips)' gives a clear context for when this tool is appropriate. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the context is specific enough for an agent to recognize its intended scenario.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools