set_sequence_audio_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description only says 'change' without disclosing side effects, whether changes are immediate, or any requirements (e.g., sequence must be open). No annotations provided to compensate; the description carries full burden but adds little beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that conveys the essential information without any wasted words. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with two optional parameters and no output schema, the description is largely complete. It identifies the target (active sequence) and the settings to change. Missing detail on what happens if no parameters are provided, but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both parameters having clear descriptions (sample rate examples, channel type enum). The tool description restates these without adding new semantic value, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it changes audio settings (sample rate, channel type) of the active sequence. It is specific and not a tautology, but does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'set_sequence_settings' which could also affect audio settings indirectly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'adjust_audio_levels' or 'set_sequence_settings'. No mention of prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.