Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Preview Editorial Plan

preview_editorial_plan
Read-onlyIdempotent

Revalidates a server-issued editorial plan against saved project-context revisions and returns an opaque confirmation token. Read-only, it verifies the plan without applying it.

Instructions

Revalidate an exact server-issued editorial plan against the saved project-context revisions and return an opaque confirmation token. This tool is read-only and cannot apply the plan.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
planYesUnchanged plan returned by create_editorial_plan from this running server instance.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.25.0
    • addedOutput schema / properties / idempotency
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Present when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.24.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_cep_target
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "sequence_id"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "required": [
      +        "source_item"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Optional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "backend": {
      +      "const": "cep",
      +      "description": "Backend namespace for these IDs.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clip": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Optional exact reviewed timeline clip.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "effect": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "Reviewed effect and parameter identity checked before mutation.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "display_name": {
      +              "description": "Optional exact host display name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "match_name": {
      +              "description": "Effect match name from host inspection.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_index": {
      +              "description": "Inspected zero-based parameter index.",
      +              "maximum": 255,
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "parameter_name": {
      +              "description": "Exact inspected parameter name.",
      +              "maxLength": 512,
      +              "minLength": 1,
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "match_name",
      +            "parameter_index",
      +            "parameter_name"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "end_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive timeline end ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "in_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected source In ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Stable CEP node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "out_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected exclusive source Out ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "project_item_id": {
      +          "description": "Expected source project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "start_ticks": {
      +          "description": "Exact expected timeline start ticks.",
      +          "pattern": "^-?\\d{1,30}$",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "track_index": {
      +          "description": "Expected zero-based track index; identity still checked.",
      +          "maximum": 255,
      +          "minimum": 0,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "track_type": {
      +          "description": "Expected media track group.",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "video",
      +            "audio"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id",
      +        "track_type",
      +        "track_index"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "project_document_id": {
      +      "description": "Exact Premiere project document ID observed during review.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sequence_id": {
      +      "description": "Stable expected active sequence ID.",
      +      "maxLength": 512,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source_item": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Reviewed source identity for a source-only operation.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "media_path": {
      +          "description": "Optional exact source-media path.",
      +          "maxLength": 4096,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "node_id": {
      +          "description": "Exact project-item node ID.",
      +          "maxLength": 512,
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "node_id"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "backend"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / expected_project_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.",
      +  "maxLength": 4096,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Versioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.18.6
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  4. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.14.9
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • removedInput schema / properties / plan / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedInput schema / properties / plan / propertyNames
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  5. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Addedv1.13.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds two useful behavioral details: it returns an opaque confirmation token and cannot apply the plan. It does not cover token lifetime, failure semantics, or what happens when the plan is stale—minor gaps given the strong annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words; the core purpose is front-loaded. The second sentence is slightly redundant with the readOnlyHint annotation, but it still provides a useful explicit clarification for the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema and rich annotations that carry much of the burden. The description confirms the read-only nature, the token return, and the inability to apply, which is adequate for a preview tool. It stops short of explaining how to use the token or the exact failure modes, but that is not strictly required to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema thoroughly documents all three parameters including the 'plan' field's origin from create_editorial_plan. The description adds marginal value by calling the plan 'exact' and 'server-issued', but mostly reiterates information already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('revalidate') and resource ('editorial plan'), and clarifies the tool cannot apply the plan. This distinguishes it from apply_edit_plan, but it does not explicitly name that sibling or create_editorial_plan to help the agent choose between preview tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'exact server-issued editorial plan' implies the tool should be used after create_editorial_plan, and 'cannot apply' hints it is a preview step. However, there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no named alternatives, and no prerequisites (e.g., must be same server instance) stated in the description itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools