Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Import Mogrt

import_mogrt

Import a Motion Graphics Template (.mogrt) into a Premiere Pro timeline and set text fields with readback verification.

Instructions

Import a Motion Graphics Template (.mogrt) file and add it to the timeline. Pass text_values (for example { "Headline": "..." }) to write each text control explicitly after insertion and verify it by readback, so a template default or stale value is never left in place silently.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
mogrt_pathYesFull path to the .mogrt file
text_valuesNoOptional map of MOGRT text parameter display names to the exact text to write (for example { "Headline": "Chapter 3" }). Each value is written explicitly after import and read back; the result reports verified, mismatch, missing_property, or committed_unverified per field.
track_indexNoVideo track index (default: 0)
start_secondsNoStart time in seconds (default: 0)
duration_secondsNoDuration in seconds (default: 5). Applied after import by moving the graphic's end and read back; a duration that would overlap the next clip on the track is not applied.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.18.6
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / duration_seconds / description
      Previous value: -"Duration in seconds (default: 5)"New value: +"Duration in seconds (default: 5). Applied after import by moving the graphic's end and read back; a duration that would overlap the next clip on the track is not applied."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"Tool-specific result data when ok is true."New value: +"Tool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.18.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / text_values
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "description": "Optional map of MOGRT text parameter display names to the exact text to write (for example { \"Headline\": \"Chapter 3\" }). Each value is written explicitly after import and read back; the result reports verified, mismatch, missing_property, or committed_unverified per field.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  5. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the generic non-read-only, non-destructive, non-idempotent profile. The description adds real behavioral detail beyond that: text values are written explicitly after insertion and verified by readback, and duration is applied post-import and read back with overlapping durations rejected. This is exactly the extra context annotations cannot supply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, with the core purpose front-loaded before the verification rationale. The second sentence is long but every clause (explicit write, readback, avoiding stale defaults) carries information, so little is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is not needed, and the annotations cover the safety profile. The description covers the key side effects (post-import writes, readback, duration clipping), though it does not warn that repeated calls are non-idempotent and will duplicate the graphic on the timeline.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description still adds value by explaining the intent behind text_values (avoiding stale/default text) and the readback verification flow, going beyond the schema's mechanical field docs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Import a Motion Graphics Template (.mogrt) file and add it to the timeline'), which is concrete enough to distinguish it from set/sequence tools. However, it never contrasts itself with close siblings like import_mogrt_from_library or import_media, leaving the agent to infer which import path applies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear guidance on when to pass text_values and why (so defaults are not silently left in place), which is useful implied usage. But there is no guidance on when to choose this tool over the many other MOGRT/import siblings (import_mogrt_from_library, import_media, import_ae_comps), so the selection decision is left implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools