set_sequence_display_format

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only restates the action implied by the name and annotations. It does not disclose what happens when parameters are omitted (both are optional), whether changes are immediate, or if there are any side effects (e.g., sequence must be active). Annotations indicate non-read-only, but description adds no behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the essential information. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the schema and annotations cover basic information, the description lacks details on optional parameter behavior, default values, or the need for an active sequence. Given the tool's simplicity, it is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters, mapping numeric values to formats. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Set') and the resource ('timecode display format for the active sequence'), making it easy to understand the tool's purpose. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like set_sequence_settings, which could also modify display settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_sequence_settings). There is no context about prerequisites, such as requiring an active sequence, or when it is appropriate to change the display format.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.