Skip to main content
Glama
leancoderkavy

Premiere Pro MCP Server

Copy Effect Values

copy_effect_values

Copy verified scalar effect-property values from an effect on one clip to the matching effect on another clip, preserving correct settings when both clips have the same effect applied.

Instructions

Copy verified scalar effect-property values from one effect to the matching effect on another clip. Both clips must already have the same effect applied. Legacy CEP deliberately refuses Blend Mode because Premiere can corrupt its enum value on cross-clip writes.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
effect_nameYesDisplay name of the effect to copy values for
source_node_idYesNode ID of the source clip
target_node_idYesNode ID of the target clip

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.14.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Tool-specific result data when ok is true."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Failure detail when ok is false.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the tool completed successfully.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "description": "The registered MCP tool name.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. First observedv1.1.1

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses a meaningful behavioral quirk: 'Legacy CEP deliberately refuses Blend Mode because Premiere can corrupt its enum value on cross-clip writes.' This explains a limitation and its rationale, which is exactly the kind of context an agent needs to avoid an unexpected failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no filler. It front-loads the core operation, then adds the prerequisite and the important Blend Mode limitation. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with only three required parameters, a clear prerequisite, an important exception, and an existing output schema, the description is complete. An agent can determine when to call it, what it copies, what it refuses to copy, and the preconditions required for success.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter meanings are already fully documented. The description adds context about 'scalar' values and the matching-effect requirement, but it does not add per-parameter detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action ('Copy'), the resource ('verified scalar effect-property values'), and the operation's scope ('from one effect to the matching effect on another clip'). It distinguishes itself from broader copy tools like copy_effects_between_clips by noting it only handles scalar values and requires both clips to already have the same effect applied.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives an explicit precondition: 'Both clips must already have the same effect applied.' It also notes a specific non-supported case (Blend Mode). However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when to prefer a sibling like set_effect_property or copy_effects_between_clips.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools