hosting_listWordPressThemesV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description should disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication requirements, or pagination. It only states 'list' and implies no side effects, but fails to explicitly confirm it's a safe, read-only operation. No rate limits or error conditions are mentioned, which is a gap for a listing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences. The first sentence states the core purpose, and the second provides a critical flow hint. Every word earns its place; no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description implies the return includes 'slug' values, which is sufficient for its simple purpose. It does not describe other fields, pagination, or limits, but for a straightforward list tool with only two optional parameters, the context is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any meaning beyond the schema definitions; for example, it does not clarify how 'search' matching works (substring vs exact) or what an 'order_id' represents. The agent must rely solely on the schema for parameter interpretation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List WordPress themes available to install', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like hosting_listInstalledWordPressThemesV1 by specifying 'available to install'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent to use the returned slug values with the install endpoint, providing immediate next-step guidance. However, it does not contrast with alternatives like searching or listing installed themes, nor does it specify when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.