agency-hosting_linkDomainToAgencyPlanWebsiteV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It states the outcome ('serve traffic') but does not explain what operations occur (e.g., DNS changes, verification steps, or reversibility). This leaves significant gaps for an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, well-structured sentence conveys the entire purpose without unnecessary words. Every part contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple linking tool with full schema coverage, the description covers the core action and purpose. However, it lacks details on behavioral traits and usage context, which would elevate completeness further.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions already present (domain and website_uid). The tool description adds no extra semantic value beyond restating the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Links') and resource ('domain to Agency Plan website') and clearly states the purpose ('so it can serve traffic for that domain'). It distinguishes this from sibling tools like unlink or change domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for linking a domain but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives (e.g., changeDomain, unlinkDomain) or any prerequisites (e.g., domain ownership, DNS setup). No exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.