hosting_getPhpMyAdminLinkV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full responsibility. It states the tool returns a link but does not disclose any safety aspects (e.g., read-only, non-destructive) or potential side effects. Minimal, but acceptable for a simple retrieval tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, concise and front-loaded. No unnecessary words; each sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but the description explains the return value as a direct sign-on link. Could mention if the link is time-limited or single-use, but overall adequate for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline is 3. The description adds context for the 'name' parameter (must be full name from list databases endpoint), which also appears in the schema. The 'username' parameter has a vague schema description and no additional context from the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns a direct sign-on link to phpMyAdmin for a specified database. The verb 'returns' and resource 'link to phpMyAdmin' are specific. Distinguishes from sibling tools as it is the only one providing a phpMyAdmin link.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises use when a visual database interface is needed for SQL queries, imports, exports, or table management. Also specifies that the database name must be the full name from the list databases endpoint. No mention of alternatives, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.