DNS_resetDNSRecordsV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It indicates a destructive reset (restoring to default records) but lacks details on reversibility, whether all custom records are deleted, the effect of the 'sync' parameter on execution mode, or potential side effects. The description is partially transparent but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences that clearly front-load the primary action ('Reset DNS zone to the default records') and then provide a brief elaboration. Every word is purposeful, with no redundancy or extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the tool (4 parameters, including a whitelist and async option) and the lack of an output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It omits crucial context such as what happens after reset, how the sync flag affects operation, and the behavior of the whitelist. A more thorough description would better equip an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond what is already documented in the input schema. For example, 'whitelisted_record_types' is described in the schema as 'Specifies which record types to not reset.' The description does not elaborate further, so it meets the baseline for a fully covered schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states what the tool does: 'Reset DNS zone to the default records' and 'restore domain DNS to original configuration.' The verb is specific ('Reset') and the resource is clear ('DNS zone'). It distinguishes itself from siblings like DNS_deleteDNSRecordsV1 and DNS_updateDNSRecordsV1 by implying a reset to default rather than selective deletion or update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as DNS_restoreDNSSnapshotV1 or DNS_deleteDNSRecordsV1. It does not mention prerequisites, consequences, or scenarios where this tool is inappropriate. Users must infer based on the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.