hostinger-api-mcp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It indicates a reset/restore action, implying mutation, but lacks details on permissions, reversibility, side effects, or rate limits. The description does not disclose what 'default records' entail or how the reset impacts existing configurations beyond the vague 'original configuration.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the core purpose. Both sentences are relevant, with no redundant information. However, the second sentence slightly rephrases the first without adding significant value, preventing a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a DNS reset operation (mutative, with 4 parameters), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It lacks details on behavioral traits, error conditions, and the nature of 'default records.' The high schema coverage helps, but the description does not compensate for the missing context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter-specific information beyond implying a 'domain' reset. It does not explain the semantics of parameters like 'reset_email_records' or 'whitelisted_record_types' in the context of the reset operation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Reset DNS zone to the default records' and 'restore domain DNS to original configuration.' It specifies the verb ('reset'/'restore') and resource ('DNS zone'/'domain DNS'), but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like DNS_deleteDNSRecordsV1 or DNS_updateDNSRecordsV1, which are related but distinct operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions restoring to 'original configuration' but does not specify scenarios, prerequisites, or exclusions. Sibling tools like DNS_restoreDNSSnapshotV1 offer similar restoration capabilities, but no comparison is made.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.