VPS_setPanelPasswordV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It discloses that requests for non-panel OS VMs are processed without effect and references password requirements via link. However, it doesn't mention required VM state or potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with purpose, and every sentence adds necessary information: purpose, special behavior, and usage context. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 2 required parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose, behavior, and password constraints. It could mention prerequisites like VM running state, but overall adequately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with basic descriptions for both parameters. The description adds value by linking password requirements to the recreate endpoint, providing external context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the panel password for a VM, using specific verb and resource. It also notes a special case (no effect if non-panel OS). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from related sibling tools like VPS_setRootPasswordV1.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides context that this endpoint configures control panel access credentials and mentions the no-effect caveat for non-panel OS VMs. But no when-not-to-use guidelines or mention of alternatives like VPS_setRootPasswordV1 are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.