VPS_getProjectContainersV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses that the tool returns detailed container information including status, port mappings, and runtime configuration, but does not mention authentication requirements, rate limits, or any side effects. The operation appears to be a safe read, so no contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences: purpose, return details, and usage advice. Every sentence adds value, and the structure is front-loaded with the primary function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately covers the return data. It could mention error scenarios or prerequisites (e.g., project must exist), but for a simple listing tool, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add any meaning beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., 'virtualMachineId' and 'projectName'). The description restates schema concepts without additional clarification.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a list of containers for a specific Docker Compose project. It uses the specific verb 'Retrieves' and resource 'containers', distinguishing it from other project tools like VPS_getProjectContentsV1, though not explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a use case ('monitor health and state of all services') but does not specify when not to use this tool or mention alternatives among siblings, such as VPS_getProjectLogsV1 or VPS_getProjectContentsV1.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.