domains_disablePrivacyProtectionV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses primary effect (personal info becomes visible) but does not mention other behavioral traits like ownership requirements, irreversibility, or side effects. No annotations to supplement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple action with one parameter and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It could mention ownership prerequisite but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameter 'domain' is adequately described as 'Domain name'. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (disable privacy protection) and the resource (domain). It explains the effect (personal info visible in WHOIS) and distinguishes from sibling enable tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Describes when to use ('make domain owner's information publicly visible'), but lacks explicit when-not or alternatives. Context is clear, no exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.