DNS_restoreDNSSnapshotV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It explains the core behavior (restore DNS to snapshot) but does not disclose side effects (e.g., overwriting current records), authorization requirements, or propagation delays. The description is minimal but not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short, front-loaded sentences with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has low complexity (2 required parameters, no output schema). The description covers the basic operation but lacks guidance on prerequisites (e.g., needing a snapshot from DNS_getDNSSnapshotListV1) or what happens after restoration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already fully documents both parameters (domain and snapshotId), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional context or format details beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Restore DNS zone') and the target resource ('selected snapshot'). It also explains the purpose: 'revert domain DNS to a previous configuration'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like DNS_getDNSSnapshotListV1 and DNS_getDNSSnapshotV1.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use this tool: 'Use this endpoint to revert domain DNS to a previous configuration.' It provides clear context but does not mention when not to use it or provide alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.