hosting_listOrdersV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of transparency. It discloses that it returns own and shared orders, and that pagination is supported via parameters. It does not mention rate limits, permissions, or other behavioral traits, but for a read-only list operation, this is reasonably transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two paragraphs, front-loading the purpose. It could be slightly more succinct, but it efficiently conveys the key information without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description provides the scope (own/shared orders) and filtering options, but does not describe the return structure or fields of an order. This is adequate for a list operation but could be more complete with details about the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description mentions filtering by statuses and order IDs, but does not add significant new information beyond what the schema already provides. The baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a paginated list of orders accessible to the authenticated client, including both own hosting accounts and shared ones. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like billing_getSubscriptionListV1 or hosting_listWebsitesV1, which deal with different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the tool (to list orders) and mentions filtering by statuses or order IDs, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternative tools. It provides clear context for usage, but lacks exclusionary guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.