VPS_uninstallMonarxV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses idempotency (no effect if not installed) but does not detail permissions, side effects, or whether all Monarx data is removed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: purpose, idempotency, and context. No redundant information, earning top marks for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple uninstall tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is largely complete. It could mention it is the inverse of installMonarx, but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter virtualMachineId is fully covered by the schema description. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond specifying the VM, meriting the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the verb 'Uninstall,' the resource 'Monarx malware scanner,' and the context 'on a specified virtual machine.' The counterpart VPS_installMonarxV1 exists among siblings, making differentiation clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes that if Monarx is not installed, the request has no effect, implying safe usage. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives and does not mention prerequisites like VM existence.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.