hosting_createWebsiteV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description compensates by disclosing that creation takes a few minutes, that datacenter_code is required for the first website on a new plan, and that subsequent websites use the same datacenter. It also advises checking the websites list endpoint for availability.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loading the purpose, and each sentence adds value without redundancy. It covers purpose, required parameters, special condition, timing, and how to verify completion.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description provides necessary context: purpose, required/conditional parameters, asynchronous nature, and how to check results. It is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining the condition for datacenter_code (required for first website on new hosting plan) and that subsequent websites use the same datacenter, which is not in the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a website, listing the required inputs (domain, order ID) and mentioning the optional datacenter_code. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'horizons_createWebsiteV1', which may have a similar purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on when to use datacenter_code (first website on new hosting plan) and suggests checking the websites list endpoint for completion. It does not mention when not to use the tool or alternatives like 'horizons_createWebsiteV1'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.