domains_getOutgoingDomainMoveListV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It adds the key filter (only uncompleted moves) and implies read-only via 'Retrieve', but does not disclose pagination, sorting, or response format. This is adequate but leaves room for more detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences total, front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by a critical filter and a use-case sentence. No wasted words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list operation with no params and no output schema, the description adequately covers what, the status filter, and when to use it. It could mention response shape or link to the singular endpoint, but the tool's simplicity makes this largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100% (empty properties). The description does not need to explain parameters, and the baseline for zero-parameter tools is 4. No additional parameter information is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves all domains being moved to other Hostinger accounts, using a specific verb (Retrieve) and resource (outgoing domain moves). It distinguishes from sibling tools like the singular getOutgoingDomainMoveV1 and incoming move list by emphasizing 'all' and the 'not completed yet' filter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context by stating that only incomplete moves are returned and recommends using it to track initiated moves and their target accounts. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives (e.g., use the singular endpoint for a specific move), so there is no exclusions list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.