hosting_getCronJobOutputV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions returning 'output captured from the last execution', which is key, but does not mention side effects, auth needs, or error handling. The read-only nature is implied but not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no unnecessary words. Efficiently communicates the core action and prerequisite.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (get output, two parameters), the description is mostly complete. However, it lacks details on what 'output' includes (e.g., stdout, stderr) and handling of missing executions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The uid parameter description is helpful, but username is simply 'username parameter', adding no meaning beyond the name. The tool description does not add additional parameter context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Returns the output captured') and the resource ('cron job identified by its uid'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like hosting_listAccountCronJobsV1 by specifying it gets output of the last execution, not the list of jobs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates prerequisite: 'The uid is returned by the list cron jobs endpoint.' It provides context on when to use this tool, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.