hosting_changeDatabasePasswordV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the mutation effect and a behavioral consequence (updating configs), but lacks details on permissions, immediate effect, or reversibility. Some value is added beyond the action itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose, second provides essential guidelines. No redundant or unnecessary information. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with three string parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose, prerequisite, and a post-action instruction. It could mention immediate effect or potential disconnection, but overall it is mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description repeats the schema's note about the 'name' parameter requiring the full database name, but does not add new meaning for 'username' or 'password'. No enhancement over the input schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Changes' and the resource 'password for the specified database user'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like hosting_createAccountDatabaseV1 and hosting_repairDatabaseV1 by specifying the precise action of changing a password.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: it requires the full database name from the list databases endpoint and notes that the password must be updated in website configurations. While it does not explicitly exclude alternative tools, the context is sufficient for appropriate selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.