domains_getTransferV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description only says 'retrieve', implying read-only. It does not disclose required permissions, error behavior, or any side effects, leaving significant gaps for a tool that interacts with domain transfers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and a usage note. No wasted words, very efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description could detail what fields are returned (e.g., status, dates). It is adequate but not exhaustive for a retrieval tool with a single parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% as the 'domain' parameter is described as 'Domain name'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, typical for baseline scoring.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a transfer for a specified domain, using the verb 'retrieve' and resource 'transfer'. It implies singularity but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling 'domains_getTransferListV1'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using it to track an incoming or outgoing transfer status, providing clear context. However, it omits when not to use it, such as for listing transfers or alternatives like 'domains_getTransferListV1'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.