hosting_listDatabaseRemoteConnectionsV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It implies a read operation with 'Returns', but does not explicitly state it is non-destructive or mention any side effects, rate limits, or response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two focused sentences: the first defines what the tool returns with format details, and the second provides a usage hint. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate but lacks details on pagination, response format (no output schema), and clarification of the username parameter's context (e.g., hosting account). It covers the core functionality but leaves gaps for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions. The description adds limited value by reiterating the domain filter's purpose, but does not explain the username parameter beyond what the schema provides ('username parameter').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns remote-access rules for the account, specifying the resource (remote hosts) and format (IPv4/IPv6 or '%'). It distinguishes itself from siblings like hosting_createDatabaseRemoteConnectionV1 and hosting_deleteDatabaseRemoteConnectionV1, which deal with managing rather than listing rules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear guidance on using the domain filter to narrow results. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use the tool or mention alternatives, though the context of a list operation is straightforward.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.