hosting_toggleMaintenanceModeV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It describes the action but does not disclose side effects (e.g., site downtime), permissions needed, rate limits, or response format. The behavior is straightforward but lacks complete transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with main purpose, no redundant information. Every sentence serves a purpose: stating the action and providing the key prerequisite.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle with no output schema, the description covers essential aspects: purpose, required parameter source, and dependency. Missing response details (e.g., status code, confirmation message) but acceptable for this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all three parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description adds value for the 'software' parameter by explaining how to obtain it, but does not clarify 'username' beyond the schema's vague 'username parameter'. Baseline 3, marginal improvement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb (enable/disable), resource (maintenance mode for WordPress installation), and the condition (based on enabled flag). It distinguishes from sibling tools like hosting_showMaintenanceStatusV1 by focusing on toggling vs. viewing status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context: provide the WordPress installation identifier obtained from a specific endpoint. It implies when to use (when toggling maintenance mode) but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives like showMaintenanceStatus.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.