agency-hosting_createWebsiteCronJobV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It adds useful context about the return value and the necessity of the uuid for deletion, but it does not mention potential side effects, permission requirements, error behavior, or safety implications. It is not misleading, but it is sparse on behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exactly two sentences: the first sentence states the core purpose, and the second adds critical return-value context. There is no fluff or redundancy; every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with no output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: what it does, the target scope, and the return value including a dependency link to deletion. It doesn't elaborate on limitations or prerequisites beyond the Agency Plan scope, but the schema covers parameter details. It is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already fully documented. The description's mention of 'schedule expression' and 'command' merely echoes the schema without adding new semantic meaning or clarifying parameter relationships. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Creates a cron job'), the target resource ('for an Agency Plan website'), and the inputs ('from a schedule expression and a command'). It also distinguishes itself from account-level cron job tools by specifying Agency Plan website scope, and adds a distinctive return-value detail (uuid for deletion).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for Agency Plan websites, which helps differentiate from siblings like hosting_createAccountCronJobV1, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusion criteria. The scope is clear, but the guidance is implied rather than prescriptive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.