domains_getIncomingDomainMoveListV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses that moves of every status are returned, including completed ones, which is a non-obvious behavior. It does not describe response format or pagination, but for a simple list tool this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with the main action, no redundant information. Every sentence adds value: the first states the core purpose, the second clarifies scope, and the third gives usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is relatively simple (no parameters, no output schema), and the description adequately covers the purpose and usage. However, it does not mention any potential response structure or pagination, which could leave an agent slightly uncertain about what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the description cannot add parameter-specific meaning. The input schema is empty, and the description doesn't need to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('Retrieve') and resource ('all domains other Hostinger accounts are moving to your account'), distinguishing itself from sibling tools like the singular 'getIncomingDomainMove' by being a list operation. It also clarifies scope (all statuses) and purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this endpoint to find domains waiting for you to accept them,' which gives an actionable use case. It doesn't explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, but the context is clear enough for an agent to understand when to choose this over the singular variant.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.