hosting_listAvailableWordPressPluginsV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool lists plugins; it does not explicitly confirm it is a read-only operation, nor does it explain what 'recommended' means or any permission requirements. The verb 'list' implies read-only, but the description could be more transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first sentence states the core purpose, and the second provides a usage hint. No extraneous information is included, making it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not mention what the response contains (e.g., plugin names, versions). It also lacks details on filtering or pagination. For a simple listing tool, it is adequate but misses opportunities to fully inform the agent about the response format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has descriptions for both parameters, with 100% coverage. The description adds value by explaining how to obtain the 'software' identifier from another API endpoint. However, it does not elaborate on the 'username' parameter, whose schema description is unhelpful ('username parameter'). Thus, the description partially compensates but not fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists 'plugins recommended for installation that are not yet installed'. It uses a specific verb 'list' and identifies the resource. However, it lacks explicit differentiation from similar siblings like 'hosting_listSuggestedWordPressPluginsV1', which may have overlapping functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a concrete instruction on providing the software identifier and how to obtain it from another endpoint. It does not, however, specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'hosting_listInstalledWordPressPluginsV1' or 'hosting_listSuggestedWordPressPluginsV1', nor does it mention any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.