domains_getDomainRenewalInformationV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, but description implies a read-only operation by saying 'retrieve renewal information.' Lacks details on authentication, rate limits, or other behavioral traits, but is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey purpose and usage. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and single parameter, description covers what the tool does and when to use it. Could mention domain ownership requirement, but overall complete for a simple read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (domain) with schema coverage 100% and description 'Domain name.' Tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool retrieves renewal information for a domain, including status and expiration date. Distinguishes from sibling tools like domains_getDomainDetailsV1 by focusing specifically on renewal info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit use cases: 'build renewal automation and expiry monitoring for a single domain.' Does not explicitly state when not to use or compare with alternatives, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.