hosting_setAIOptionStatusV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only states the action (enable/disable) with no mention of side effects, required permissions, idempotency, or what happens if the option is already in the desired state. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences: the first clearly states the purpose, and the second provides practical parameter guidance. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main purpose and one key parameter hint, but lacks explanation of the AI options (llmstxt, web2agent) and any return value information. Given no output schema, some description of expected behavior after invocation would improve completeness. It is adequate but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all 4 parameters with descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, only hinting at how to get the software identifier. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool enables or disables an AI option for the Hostinger Tools plugin on a WordPress installation. The verb 'enable or disable' is specific, and the resource (AI option status) is clearly identified. It distinguishes from sibling hosting_showAIOptionStatusV1 which only shows status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use the tool (to enable/disable AI options) and includes guidance on obtaining the required software identifier from another endpoint. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention the sibling show tool as an alternative for reading status.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.