agency-hosting_createWebsiteDatabaseV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that a database and dedicated user are created and that credentials must be provided, but it does not explain side effects, return values, error conditions, or whether the operation is idempotent or requires specific permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short, focused sentences: the first states the tool's core purpose and the second states a key caller requirement. There is no redundant or extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple create operation with well-documented parameters, but it lacks guidance on competing sibling tools and does not disclose return behavior or post-creation implications. The absence of an output schema makes the missing return-value context more significant.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all parameters. The description adds only that the values 'must all be provided by the caller,' which restates the required fields rather than adding meaningful semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Creates a MySQL database with a dedicated user') and the resource scope ('for an Agency Plan website'). It also differentiates from the sibling agency-hosting_createWebsiteDatabaseUserV1 by emphasizing that this tool creates both the database and a dedicated user together.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context ('for an Agency Plan website') and notes that all three identifying values must be provided by the caller. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus the closely related sibling agency-hosting_createWebsiteDatabaseUserV1, nor does it offer any exclusions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.