agency-hosting_createAgencyPlanWebsiteDatabaseV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states creation of database+user but omits what the response looks like, idempotency, limits, or association with the website_uid parameter. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences directly state the action and a key requirement. No fluff, front-loaded with the main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create tool with 4 required params, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is inadequate. It does not explain the return value, the association with the website_uid, or any error conditions. The caller is left guessing about success indicators.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds no new meaning beyond restating that database name, username, password must be provided, which is already clear from the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a MySQL database with a dedicated user for an Agency Plan website, which is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like createAgencyPlanWebsiteDatabaseUserV1 (user-only) or delete versions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for creating a database+user pair but does not provide explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives (e.g., the separate user creation tool). Siblings exist but no differentiation mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.