agency-hosting_createAgencyPlanWebsiteDatabaseUserV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry full burden. It discloses the creation action and the failure condition when a user already exists, but does not mention permissions, side effects, or return values. The constraint is useful, but more behavioral detail (e.g., idempotency, auth requirements) would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action, and zero wasted words. Every sentence adds value, making it highly concise and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters (4 required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description adequately covers the core purpose and a key constraint. It does not explain prerequisite steps (e.g., listing databases), but the schema descriptions compensate. The contextual note about single user per database is valuable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-specific details beyond the schema, such as format constraints on password or database_name. The schema already handles this, so the description does not need to repeat.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a user for an existing database on an Agency Plan website, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'createAgencyPlanWebsiteDatabaseV1' by focusing on user creation and mentioning the constraint of a single non-system user per database.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly warns that creating a user for a database that already has one fails, providing a clear when-not-to-use condition. It implicitly requires an existing database and website_uid, though it does not explicitly mention alternatives or prerequisites like listing databases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.