get_chat_message_replies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool is read-only, paginated via cursor/limit, and returns specific fields (id, content, author, timestamp). This adequately discloses the behavior, though lacks details on rate limits or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states purpose and scope, second lists output fields and pagination method. Every sentence is essential, no wasted words, and the most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, so the description must explain return values—it does by listing fields (id, content, author, timestamp). It also mentions pagination. For a simple read operation with good input schema coverage, this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides—it restates the team_id fallback and message_id purpose, which are already in the schema descriptions. No new semantic information is added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'threaded replies to a Chat message', specifying it's for ClickUp Chat v3. It also lists the returned fields, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_chat_messages which list messages themselves.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving replies to a specific message, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_chat_messages or get_chat_message_reactions. No exclusion criteria are provided, so the agent must infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.